Peace is Active

We have the ability to live in peace

Everyone has their own idea about what peace is and how we should support the goal of peace.

Hitler wanted to conquer the world so his people could live in peace.

Islamic fundamentalists want to create a Caliphate where everyone will live in peace under their religious rule.

The Bush Administration thinks we will live in peace once we have a global market where most decisions are made according to market values.

Since almost all wars have been fought in the name of peace, peace activists need to promote the idea that peace must be both the goal and the strategy.

We have the ability to foster peace on earth through peaceful means and that is where our focus should be.

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

"peace must be both the goal and the strategy" is one of the most important lesson we can learn.

If war is viewed as a legitimate tool, leaders will continue to find ways to motivate or scare people into wars.

Reply to This

I don't know if there was ever a war that didn't have peace as the stated goal.
I think this is why we need to talk about the goal and realize we don't need war to get there.

Reply to This

In terms of Iraq, the goal of a democratic and open Middle East is a good one, but I don't agree with any strategy that involves:

lying to the American people in order to go to war

using violence as a political tool

doing anything that leads to 5 million people being displaced from their homes

using a strategy called "shock and awe" where most of the people who were shocked, killed and wounded were civilians.

etc....

Reply to This

This is where Bush is wrong. He usually says people who disagree with his strategies don't support a free and democratic Middle East. He is wrong to assume that his violent strategies are the only strategies for achieving the stated goal.

Reply to This

This strategy of using war to get peace is once again being raised as the Bush Administration is looking for reasons to attack Iran.

Reply to This

It is sad to think that one day people might look back on Bush as a good President becasue he changed the Middle East - assuming Iraq will one day get on its feet and use its huge oil wealth to build a competent country. This is like people looking back on the American expansion into the West as a good thing as long as we ignore what happened to the native americans. We all want to see legitimate governments, fair markets, and healthy environments in the Middle East and all over the world, but the death and destruction of the Iraq occupation has been a terrible strategy for getting there.

Reply to This

"You can bomb the world into pieces, but you can't bomb it into to peace." Michael Franti.

Reply to This

I like that quote

Reply to This

So we need to fight peacefully. Do you know how to do it?

Reply to This

I think it starts with open communication where ideas can spread freely. If people only hear about the need for war, then that is what they will probably support.

Second, I think it is important to get people to take action in non-violent ways. I think the most important action is to elect good leaders who support peaceful policies, but we also need people who take action by exposing illegal activites, helping the poor, creating beautiful art and music, inventing sustainable technology, teaching others, etc....

Reply to This

RSS

Bookmark


Bookmark and Share

Badge

Loading…

© 2010   Created by Peace is Active on Ning.   Create a Ning Network!

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Privacy  |  Terms of Service